Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSME Facilitation Council Award on Maintainability Grounds. Council Has Jurisdiction Over Disputes Arising Before 2006 Act Came Into Effect.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an award of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (respondent no. 4) in a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as not perverse.

The petitioner, Rohidas Premchand Bhagat, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1 Novemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition Against Reversal of Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Revision Set Aside as It Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence Without Finding Perversity.

The petitioner, an employee working as a Chowkidar at Government Shishu Sadan, Padampura, Aurangabad, filed a complaint before the Labour Court, Auran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Retired Before Superannuation Age. Employer Failed to Prove Retirement Age of 58; Employee's Service Record Showed Superannuation Age of 60 Under Item 9 Schedule IV MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a writ petition filed by National Bicycle Corporation of India Ltd. (the employer) challenging an order of the Industrial Court date...