Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1870 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1870 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition and Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Landlord's bonafide need for personal cultivation under Section 33B and default in rent under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from agricultural tenancy disputes over the same suit property. The landlord, Tukaram Maruti Dubal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Using Commercial Shop for Residential Purposes Under Section 13(1)(a) of Bombay Rent Act. Change of User from Business to Residence Constitutes Acts Contrary to Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, Even Without Physical Damage.

The case involves a dispute between the original plaintiff-respondent, Prabhakar Shravan Shinde, the owner of two shops in Kalyan, and the original de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons — Summons for Oral Evidence Held Valid. No Violation of Article 20(3) as Petitioner Not an Accused at Investigation Stage; Alternative Remedy Available Under CGST Act.

The petitioners, JSK Marketing Limited and its Managing Director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Arrears Case — Service of Notice and Default in Payment of Rent Upheld. Concurrent findings of trial and appellate courts on tenant's failure to pay rent and valid service of demand notice under Section 12 of Bombay Rent Act, 1947 affirmed.

The case involves a dispute between the legal heirs of the original plaintiff-landlord (Mohamudkhan Kadar Khan Pathan) and the defendant-tenant (origi...