Search Results for "valuation date"

1721 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1721 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court Order Directing Valuation Under Bombay Court Fees Act in Will Cancellation Suit. Suit for cancellation of Will is not a mere declaratory suit and requires valuation under Sections 6(iv)(d) and 6(iv)(ha) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1956.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit challenging the Will of Narinder Singh Chowdhary, who died on 21/01/2012. The plaintiffs sought a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that valuation for court fees and jurisdiction is a mixed question of law and fact not to be decided at preliminary stage.

The petitioner, M/s Prism Reality, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 30.07.2014 passed by the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Valuation of Practical Answer Books in MBBS Supplementary Examinations Due to Violation of Clinical Examination Guidelines. Court Directs Revaluation by Different Examiners Following Proper Procedure Under University Regulations.

The petitioners, Mr. Dasari Chakradhar and Mr. Shashi Kumar, were Phase III Part II (4th year) MBBS students who took supplementary examinations in Oc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of 75% Court Fee on Unconditional Withdrawal of Appeal Before Commencement of Hearing Under Section 66(2)(c) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Appellant Entitled to Refund as Withdrawal Was Unconditional and Before Hearing Commenced.

The appellant, Sri Jagadeeshaiah, filed Regular First Appeal No.1475/2014 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Agent of Vessel Liable as Owner for Port Charges Under Major Port Trusts Act. Court Interprets Section 2(o) to Include Agent, Following Supreme Court Precedent, and Finds Defendants Liable for Deficit After Consignment Sale.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, a statutory corporation, filed a suit for recovery of Rs 3,21,369.45 along with interest, being the defic...