Search Results for "urban land"

1826 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1826 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.

The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation to Rs. 300 per sq m for Acquired Land. Court Relies on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment pertains to two first appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 20.12.2014 passed by the learned District Judge-1, North Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Reservation on Land Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to initiate acquisition proceedings within ten years from sanction of development plan results in lapsing of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Saurabh R. Shah, owned land at Survey No.198, Hissa No.3/2, village Sandor, Vasai, Palghar, which was reserved for water bodies/20 met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Freeze on Mangrove Destruction in Maharashtra and Orders Comprehensive Satellite Mapping to Identify Protection Areas. High Court Recognizes Ecological Importance of Mangroves and Applies Precautionary Principle to Prevent Further Damage Pending Final Adjudication.

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bombay Environmental Action Group and another before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking prote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Urban Land Ceiling Case — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 17/06/2016 in WP Nos.54609-54610/2014(ULC) dismissed as no error apparent on record.

The review petitions were filed by M/s Vivekananda Foundation (R), claiming to be the allottee of a portion of land in Sy.Nos.81 and 82 of Kasaba Hobl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Municipal Market and Housing. Claimant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation awarded by SLAO under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case is a Land Acquisition Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimant, Pundalik Raghunath Mahulkar, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Orders Under SC/ST Act and Karnataka PTCL Act in Land Dispute. Upholds Concurrent Findings of Violation of Rights and Prohibition of Transfer of Land Belonging to Scheduled Caste Person.

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Assistant Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...