COMPANY APPEAL NOS. 1 to 7 of 2015
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "trial necessary"
13585 result(s) found
Found 13585 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Cotton Contracts Despite Minor Omissions in Contract Notes; Substantial Compliance with By-laws Sufficient under Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932. Omission to fill blanks relating to measurements and settlement rate difference does not render contracts void if trade practice supports substantial compliance.
31 Mar 1958The dispute arose from cotton transactions between the appellants and the respondent, both members of the East India Cotton Association Ltd. The appel...
- 51
Tribunals
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.
1 Jan 1970The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to CBI FIR Against Former Home Minister in Corruption Case. Petition Seeks Quashing of FIR Registered Under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120-B IPC Based on Alleged Lack of Prima Facie Offence and Statutory Bars.
22 Jul 2021The writ petition was filed by Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh, former Home Minister of Maharashtra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Sectio...
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds It Has Power to Accept Consent Terms and Compound Offence Under Section 138 NI Act in Revision Proceedings. The Court clarifies that Section 397 CrPC read with Section 401 CrPC empowers the High Court to record compromise and acquit accused even in revision, subject to satisfaction of complainant.
20 Dec 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a group of criminal revision applications and connected matters, all arising from proceedings under Section 138 of t...
- 915
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act — Use of Disjunctive 'or' in Detention Order Does Not Indicate Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority's satisfaction was based on the cumulative effect of the detenu's activities, and the mere reproduction of statutory language does not render the order invalid.
2 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging the preventive detention of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Fore...
- 952
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Women Army Officers' Right to Permanent Commission in Landmark Gender Equality Judgment. Court holds that women SSC officers are entitled to PC at par with male counterparts, rejecting discriminatory service conditions.
17 Feb 2020The case concerns a batch of appeals filed by the Ministry of Defence against a Delhi High Court judgment directing the grant of Permanent Commission ...
- 911
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Suit Challenging Show Cause Notices Issued Under 2024 RBI Master Directions Based on Forensic Audit by Allegedly Unqualified Auditor. Petitioner Contends that Audit Firm Not Chartered Accountant and Report Invalid Under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and RBI Directions.
24 Dec 2025This matter concerned three suits filed by the plaintiff, Anil D. Ambani, against Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, Bank of Baroda, and others, along w...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.
21 Mar 2006The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.
11 Jan 2012The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...
- 24
