APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.121 OF 2019
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "temporary injunction"
1638 result(s) found
Found 1638 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition and Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitration clause was valid and the award was not contrary to public policy, rejecting challenges under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute between the legal representatives of M/s. V. G. Quenim (a proprietary concern) and Smt. Vilasini Vassudev alias Manohar Gu...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Succession and Title Cannot Be Resolved in Summary Proceedings Under Land Revenue Code. Mutation entries are only for fiscal purposes and do not confer title; proper remedy is civil suit.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Shrirang S. Naik, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entries made in the revenue recor...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Cross Suits Involving Dispute Over Conveyance and Development Rights Under MOFA — Interim Injunctions Sought by Both Developer and Federation. Core Issue Concerns Whether Entire Land of a Layout Was to Be Conveyed to Federation, Precluding Developer from Completing Sanctioned Construction on Part of Land.
4 Nov 2025The dispute concerns a layout development in Mulund (East), Mumbai, where Acme Enterprises (the Developer) claimed development rights over a larger pl...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case, Restrains Defendants from Selling Allegedly Copied Books. Court finds prima facie case of substantial copying of plaintiff's literary works on Indian Economy and Polity by former students.
25 Oct 2024The appellant, Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe, filed a Commercial Appeal From Order under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the judgm...
- 337
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines PIL Filed by Environmental Group Against State Bodies and Developer. Challenge Pertains to Approvals for Construction of Hotel in Coastal Regulation Zone at Morjim, Goa.
17 Sep 2019This Public Interest Litigation filed by two environmental petitioners challenges approvals granted for construction of a hotel/beach resort by respon...
- 47
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.
1 Apr 2013The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the second appellate court cannot re-appreciate evidence unless there is a perverse finding or substantial question of law under Section 100 of CPC.
16 Feb 2024The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging t...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Construction of Crematorium Near Residential Area — No Violation of Right to Life Under Article 21 Found as Environmental Clearance and Statutory Approvals Were Obtained. The court held that the right to life does not include an absolute right to be free from inconvenience caused by lawful activities, and the balance of convenience favored the public utility.
18 Dec 2019The appellant, Shri Rama Shanu Naik Dessai, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant an injunction to restrain the constr...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Notice Not Served at Correct Address. The court held that proper service of demand notice is mandatory and failure to serve at correct address vitiates proceedings.
18 Sep 2025The petitioner, Abid Shiraz Merchant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking quashi...
- 19
