WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012
2 Apr 2013The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...
Search Results for "state transport corporation"
2383 result(s) found
Found 2383 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Recognition Application Under MRTU and PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that the Petitioner-Union failed to establish membership among employees of the successor company PMPML upheld.
22 Mar 2024The Petitioner, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order date...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.
5 Mar 2019The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...
- 253
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.
2 Jan 2025The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...
- 1796
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
1 Aug 2026The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.
11 May 2012The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...
- 86
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Challenge to Disqualification Show Cause Notices Under Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court examined allegations of natural justice violation and constitutional autonomy of local bodies, but final decision is not available in the provided excerpt.
31 Oct 2018The petitioners, nine municipal councillors and the vice president of Beed Municipal Council, filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Petitioners Failed to Show Entitlement to Surplus Land or Compliance with Statutory Requirements
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by various individuals challenging the acquisition of their lands under the Urban Land (Ceiling ...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee Composition and Tenure. Petitioners challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 as violative of separation of powers and arbitrary, seeking declaration of eligibility for re-appointment.
20 Oct 2023The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(1) and Rule 10...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Examines Constitutional Validity of Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee and Tenure. Advocate and Sitting District Commission Members Challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) Alleging Violation of Separation of Powers and Seeking Re-Appointment Eligibility.
20 Oct 2023These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The ...
