Search Results for "share purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "share purchase"

1682 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1682 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Interim Injunction Set Aside Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case for trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as the mark was originally owned by the joint venture company and the assignment was disputed.

28 Jul 2011

The case involves two appeals against a common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.553 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Suit — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Alienation of Joint Family Property.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, Smt. Shubhangi Nandakishor Gaidhani and others, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary inju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Siblings — Daughter Held Entitled to Share in Ancestral Property Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Court clarifies that daughter's right to inherit from father dying in 1944 is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and not by pre-1956 customary law, as the Act applies retrospectively for succession opening after its commencement.

1 Apr 2019

The case involves a dispute between a brother (defendant/appellant) and his sister (plaintiff/respondent) over ancestral agricultural land. Their fath...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Receiver Appointment in Partnership Dissolution Suit. Partnership at will dissolved by notice; court receiver appointed to protect assets pending final adjudication.

6 May 2005

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed Civil Suit No. 887 of 1994 seeking a declaration that the partnership firm M/s. Athavale Dairy was dissolved ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decree. The court held that the appellant-defendant No.6 failed to raise any substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC, and the concurrent findings of fact by the lower appellate court did not warrant interference.

25 Jan 2024

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the appellant, who was defendant No.6 in t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Execution Dispute — Preliminary Decree Held Executable Despite Pendency of Final Decree Proceedings. The Court restored execution proceedings under Order 20 Rule 18 CPC, emphasizing that a preliminary decree in a partition suit is executable even before the final decree is passed.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Jennifer Messias, and her husband Peter Messias purchased a flat in Jabalpur in 1991. They were judicially separated in 2003, confirmed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Co-owners Not Necessary Parties as They Claim Through Same Title as Defendants. The court held that under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, petitioners claiming to be co-owners are not necessary or proper parties to a suit for specific performance when they claim through the same title as existing defendants.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Natasha Dilip Singh and Dilip Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Arises from Interim Order in Arbitration Proceedings Between Private Parties.

25 Apr 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Compensation Claim in Khoti Abolition Matter for Determination of Proprietary Rights. Holder of Khoti Tenure Must Establish Grant or Sanad to Overcome Presumption of Government Ownership Over Forest and Waste Lands Under Bombay Khoti Abolition Act, 1949.

15 Oct 1969

The dispute centered on the entitlement of the appellants, Shyamsunder Tikam Shet and another, to compensation under section 12 of the Bombay Khoti Ab...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)