Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

597 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Teachers' Petitions for Revised Pay Scales in Aided Schools. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Government Employees Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by assistant teachers working in private aided schools in Maharashtra. The petitioners sought direction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reduction of Superannuation Age from 60 to 58 for Employees of Government Mining Corporation. State as Sole Shareholder Can Amend Service Rules Unilaterally Without Employee Consent.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Mining Corporation Ltd. (a Government company), challenged the State Government's decision to reduce t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 7034 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Petitioner, a retired Superintendent, was charged under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without prior sanction from competent authority, rendering proceedings invalid.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Nandaraju, a retired Superintendent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...