Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

527 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

24 Aug 2005

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Acquittal of Accused for Possession of Charas Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Accused Were Informed of Their Right to Be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

9 Aug 2005

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(1) — Information Not Reduced to Writing and No Intimation to Superior Officer Before Raid. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provision of Section 42(1) of NDPS Act Vitiates Trial and Conviction.

23 Feb 2005

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The appellants, Mahabubi ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Brown Sugar — Compliance with Section 50 Search Requirements Not Necessary When Accused Refuses Offer of Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The court held that the offer to the accused to search the raiding party was sufficient compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and the quantity of brown sugar recovered (7 gms and 1.4 gms) was commercial quantity, justifying the 10-year sentence.

23 Feb 2005

The appellants, Smt. Aminbi Shaikh Husain and Shri Rafik @ Bhola Abdul Sattar Pathan, were convicted by the Trial Court under the Narcotic Drugs and P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search Provisions. Failure to Follow Sections 41(2) and 42 of NDPS Act Renders Recovery of Ganja Invalid, Accused Acquitted.

4 Feb 2005

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, the Superintendent of Central Excise & Customs Preventive, Satara, challenging the judgment and orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Search Conducted Without Recording Information and Without Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Held Illegal, Acquittal Upheld.

17 Jan 2005

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, an Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, challenging the judgment and order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Charas — Conscious Possession Established. The court held that the presumption of conscious possession under Sections 54 and 35 of the NDPS Act was not rebutted by the appellant, who failed to prove that the contraband belonged to another person.

6 Jul 2005

The appellant, Mohammed Aslam, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, in Special Criminal Case No. 35/2001 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by NCB in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conspiracy. Control delivery and recovery of narcotics from parcels not sufficient to prove accused's involvement under Sections 29, 22, 23, 28, 8(c) of NDPS Act and Section 135(1)(a)(II) of Customs Act.

6 Mar 2013

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against the judgment of the Special Judge for G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Furlough Rejection Case — Nature of Offence Not a Valid Ground for Denial Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Furlough is a right, not a privilege, and cannot be denied solely because the prisoner was convicted under Section 366 IPC.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Subhash Hiralal Bhosale, was convicted under Sections 376(2), 366, 342, 506(II) read with 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration Due to Non-Compliance with Section 90(2) of Finance Act, 1998. Court holds that the Designated Authority must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground that the declarant had not paid the tax determined under the Scheme within the prescribed time.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Swam Mills Ltd., a composite textile mill, was served with 14 show cause notices for recovery of differential duty of approximate...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)