Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Sep 2019...
Search Results for "person executing"
2543 result(s) found
Found 2543 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order Directing Undertaking Against Alienation of Property. Arbitration Petition Filed Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Order Under Section 17 in a Long-Pending Development Dispute.
25 Mar 2019The Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed challenging the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order da...
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.
12 Jul 2011The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
13 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...
- 137
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order for Restitution of Possession in Temple Property Dispute. Section 144 CPC Not Attracted as Possession Was Under Interim Order, Not Decree; Court Has Inherent Power to Restore Status Quo Ante.
17 Oct 2019The appeal arose from a long-standing property dispute concerning temples and shops in Jaipur. The original plaintiff, Bansidhar Sharma (since decease...
- 445
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to 30-Year Delay in Execution — Inordinate Delay Snaps Live Link Between Grounds and Detention Purpose. Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act Set Aside as Stale Grounds Violate Right to Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.
27 Sep 2023The petitioner, Abdul Rasheed alias Basheer, challenged a detention order dated 17th May 1993 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Were Gratuitous Passengers in Goods Vehicle, Not Covered Under Insurance Policy. The court held that under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, an insurance policy for a goods vehicle does not cover passengers carried for hire or reward, and the deceased were not employees of the owner, thus the insurer is not liable.
12 Mar 2010The case involves two appeals filed by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The accident occu...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Mesne Profits Application Under Order XX Rule 10 CPC Despite Delay — No Limitation Period Prescribed for Such Application. The court held that an application for mesne profits under Order XX Rule 10 CPC is a step in execution and not governed by the Limitation Act, 1963.
12 Jul 2005The petitioner-landlord, Ishwar Daya Kevalram Agarwal, obtained a decree for possession against the respondent-tenant, Madhukar Shankar Prabhane, on 2...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Defamation Suit Execution — Attachment of Immovable Property Without Notice to Judgment Debtor Violates Order XXI Rule 54 CPC. Court holds that issuance of attachment warrant without prior notice to the judgment debtor and without recording reasons is illegal and liable to be set aside.
4 Sep 2013The petitioner, Dilipkumar Hirachand Jain, was the original plaintiff No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.332 of 1996, which was a suit for damages for defa...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Deemed Vacation of Committee Members for Failure to Execute Bond Under Section 73(1AB) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. Statutory period of 15 days for executing bond is mandatory and cannot be extended by subsequent compliance.
6 Jul 2006The petitioners, Assisi Co-operative Housing Society Limited and its committee members (petitioners 2 to 7), challenged an order dated 9th February 20...
- 73
