Search Results for "invalid application"

3826 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3826 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Judgment on Admissions in Admiralty Suit. Plaintiff Seeks Relief Under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Alleging Admissions by Defendants.

The present matter concerns an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Raj Transport and Trading Company, in the pending Admiralty Suit No. 17 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 28A(1) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 in Probate Reference. Section 28A(1) is not inconsistent with Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Civil Judges can be invested with probate jurisdiction.

This judgment arises from a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Temple Trusts. Petitioners Allege Amendment Is Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights Under Constitution.

The petitioners, comprising 64 Hindu religious institutions and charitable trusts from various districts of Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Arti...