Search Results for "employee personal details"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Death Sentence in Rape and Murder of Two Children. Conviction Under Sections 302, 376(2)(f),(g) and 201 IPC Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The review petitions were filed by Manoharan, the sole surviving accused, against the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 01.08.2019 which affirmed hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Expiry of Contractual Appointment. Applicant's status as public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ceased after contractual term ended on 31.3.2015, prior to alleged bribe demand on 29.7.2015.

The applicant, Mangesh Prabhakar Rathod, a doctor, was appointed as a psychiatrist on a contractual basis with the District Civil Surgeon's office fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Contract Driver in Corruption Case — No Demand of Bribe by Non-Public Servant. Petitioner, a contract driver of BESCOM, was not a public servant under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and no demand of bribe was made by him.

The petitioner, Mr. Murali Krishna R., was a contract driver employed at the BESCOM Corporate Office in Bengaluru. He was arraigned as accused No.2 in...