Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Group of Petitions Seeking Reconstruction of Shops Demolished by Thane Municipal Corporation; Court Examines Whether Demolition Violated Due Process and Whether Relief of Reconstruction or Compensation is Maintainable

In a group of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners, comprising various individual shop owners and a cafeteria, alleged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken in 1981, Fulfilling One of the Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a notification issued in 1965 and an award declared in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Authority in Land Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Possession Taken and Land Put to Use Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse.

The case involves an appeal by the Land and Building Department of the NCT of Delhi and others against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. The High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Claim Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken, Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as Twin Conditions Must Be Satisfied.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025

The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...