Search Results for "bribe"

752 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 752 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Padmakar s/o Warlu Alliwar, was a Gram Sewak/clerk in Grampanchayat, Palasgaon. He was convicted by the trial court in Special Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction of Complainant for Perjury in Corruption Case Due to Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Mens Rea. Trial Court's Suo Motu Conviction Without Following Section 340 CrPC and Without Affording Hearing is Unsustainable.

The appellant, Prashant Gopalrao Chandane, was the de facto complainant in a corruption case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against one ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Peon in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Demand for Rs.300 for Certified Copies Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raju Shantaram Kakphale, a peon in the Thane District Court, was convicted by the Special Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 7 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Uttam s/o Ganpat Ajgekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Anti Corruption Bureau, Greater Bombay, vide judgment dated 4th February ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Reconsideration of Sanction Refusal in Corruption Case Against Police Inspector. Court holds that sanctioning authority must apply its own mind and not rely solely on departmental inquiry findings, and that refusal of sanction must be based on valid reasons and not be arbitrary.

The petitioner, Saddam Shah Khalil Shah Fakir, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Vilas Vasudev Kunkolienkar (A1) and his wife Vijayshree Vilas Kunkolienkar (A3) challenging their c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashanand Ramji Fulekar, was convicted by the 1st Additional Principal Judge and Special Judge (CBI) on 28.1.2009 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...