Search Results for "article 120"

1829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs in Multiple Cheque Bounce Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Litigation Mediation Under Section 148 of NI Act. Court holds that failure to refer disputes to mediation before taking cognizance renders criminal proceedings invalid.

The Bombay High Court dealt with multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Passport Return Case — High Court's Revision Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 442 BNSS. Second Revision Barred Under Section 442(3) BNSS as Sessions Judge's Order Was Passed in Revision.

The appellant, Seesa Santosh, lodged a complaint on 12 October 2014 regarding the suspicious unnatural death of his father. An unnatural death case un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Accused in Smuggling Case; Customs Officers Held Not to Be Police Officers Under Section 25 Evidence Act. Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Admissible; No Violation of Article 20(3) as Accused Not Formally Accused During Inquiry Stage.

The Assistant Collector of Customs filed a complaint against Romesh Chandra Mehta and four others for conspiracy under section 120-B of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Transfers Multiple FIRs to Delhi Police IFSO Unit in Media Debate Case. Court ordered consolidation of investigation for offenses under Indian Penal Code, 1860, arising from single television broadcast, granting interim protection from coercive action but declining to quash FIRs.

The dispute originated from multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) and criminal complaints filed against the petitioner, a television anchor, in va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cooperative Society Dispute Due to Civil Nature. Allegations of Forgery and Cheating Under Sections 465, 467, 471, 420, 120-B IPC Not Made Out as Dispute Pertains to Allotment of Flats Among Members.

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha Banarasilal Sharma, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...