Search Results for "arbitrary levy"

582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit. Condition of Deposit of Rs. 18 Lakhs Upheld as Not Perverse or Arbitrary Under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Petitioner (Defendant in the suit) filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.07.2023 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Clarification in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 — Circular No.21/2020 Held Ultra Vires. The clarification requiring withdrawal of appeal as a condition for filing declaration under the Act was struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a public limited company engaged in real estate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...