Search Results for "Registered User Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Registered User Agreement"

578 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Commercial Suit for Recovery of Demurrage and Other Charges — Amendment Sought to Include Additional Claims and Correct Description of Vessel. Court Held That Amendment Does Not Introduce New Cause of Action and Is Necessary for Determination of Real Controversy.

30 Nov -0001

The present application was filed by the plaintiff, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, seeking amendment of the plaint in a commercial suit for recovery ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Specific Performance. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Mahesh Shambhulal Bhanushali @ Gori, proprietor of Vipul Octroi Centre, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28/03/2022 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Need for Residential Premises Prevails After 40-Year Litigation. The court affirmed concurrent findings of bonafide requirement under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, dismissing the tenant's petition.

22 Jan 2018

The case involves a long-standing eviction dispute between a landlord, M.K. Mahipalsingh, and a tenant, Messrs. Indian Scientific Glass Industries, a ...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

21 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Competing Claims Over Water Allocation from Upper Wardha Dam and Considers Constitutional Validity of Article 371(2) Governor’s Directives. Court Directs Interim Water Supply for 2012-13 and Frames Issues on Legality of Allocation and Binding Nature of Directives but Final Decision Not Contained in Available Text.

2 Mar 2013

The dispute arose from the allocation of 87.60 million cubic meters (MCM) of water from the Upper Wardha Dam in Amravati district, Maharashtra, to a t...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

21 Jun 2018

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Easement Right Case — Unregistered Agreement Cannot Create Easement or Transfer Ownership. Creation of right of easement by agreement requires registration under Registration Act, 1908 and does not result in transfer of ownership under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

18 Jan 2018

The appellant, Pandhari Deogade, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court against the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appel...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)