Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2113 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Order Refusing FIR Registration in Environmental Violation Case — Section 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Bars Private Complaints Without Government Sanction. The court held that Section 19 does not bar police from registering an FIR, but the applicant's complaint lacked specific allegations of violation of the Act or rules.

22 Oct 2019

The applicant, Pratap Lal Teli, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an order pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Validity of Rule 86E of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 in Recovery Proceedings. Court Holds That Rule 86E Is Not Ultra Vires Article 14 as Proceedings Under Section 101 Are Summary and Do Not Require Cross-Examination, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 154 Is Available.

9 Dec 2011

The two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 86E of the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Orders in Absence of Affidavit-in-Reply — Principles of Natural Justice Violated. The court quashed the orders invalidating caste claims and remitted the matters for fresh consideration due to lack of response from the Committee and violation of natural justice.

3 Jan 2020

The petitioners, Savita w/o Sachin Totewad and Shri Nayandeep s/o Gangadhar Pudalwad, filed two separate writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Writ Petition Challenging Compromise Decree and Execution Proceedings — Fraud and Non-Alienation Clause Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Considered

10 Dec 2025

The petitioners, judgment debtors in a compromise decree, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Order in Writ Petition Seeking Premature Release of Life Convict. Court Analyzes Applicability of Supreme Court's Sukhdev Yadav Judgment on Sentence Interpretation.

13 Mar 2026

The petitioner, a life convict serving sentence in Central Prison, Mysore, approached the High Court of Karnataka seeking a writ of mandamus for his i...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Election Petitioner’s Challenge to Illegal Voter Inclusion; Finds No Material Facts Pleaded. Court Holds That Burden to Prove Material Effect Not Discharged, Rejecting Petition Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of Representation of the People Act, 1951.

23 Dec 2011

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dismissed two election petitions challenging the election of the returned candidate from the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Fourth Child Born After Cut-off Date Despite Child's Death. The birth of a live child after the cut-off date constitutes an increase in the number of children under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the subsequent death of the child does not attract the protection of the first proviso.

13 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Patiram @ Ratiraj Shirbhiye, was elected as Member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadala on 28-8-2005. Respondent No.3, Go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

8 Mar 2013

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)