Search Results for "Joint Tenancy"

512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Oral Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that an oral partition during the lifetime of the father is valid and that the plaintiff failed to prove joint possession or title to the suit properties.

The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for partition claiming 1/3rd share in two items of property allegedly belonging to his father Nadesa Vanniyar. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Auction Purchaser Not Liable to Pay Unearned Increase to DDA in Compulsory Acquisition Case. Conversion Charges Refunded as Property Conveyed Was Freehold, Not Leasehold.

The Supreme Court of India heard two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 30.03.2016 in LPA No.226 of 2014. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Against Eviction Decree for Rent Default and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent findings of courts below upheld as tenant failed to prove that construction was pre-existing or that rent was not in arrears.

The petitioner, a tenant of a shop premises in Nashik, was sued by the respondent landlady for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Hous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...