Search Results for "Hindu family partition"

674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Appellants Held Entitled to Possession Based on Prior Possessory Title. Adverse Possession Claim by Respondents Failed as They Were Licensees, Not Adverse Possessors.

The present second appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 2.11.1998 passed by the Additional District Judge, Chandrapur, dismissing the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Self-Acquired Property. Joint Family Property Presumed Where Common Funds Used and Possession Shared.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant) seeking partition and separate possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over the suit property.

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bherumal Kucheriya, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Notification Under Section 11(1) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sahebrao Gulabrao Dhamale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Appear or Argue. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff and defendant Nos.2-4 are entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family properties under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appellant, a defendant in a partition suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure...