Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA; Grounds Include 12-Year Execution Delay and Non-Supply of Material Translations.

In 1992, the petitioner Musthafa Ahamed Dossa was named as the head of a smuggling gang in statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Parcel Bomb Murder, Holding Approver's Evidence Sufficiently Corroborated. Principle of Issue-Estoppel Held Inapplicable as Co-Accused's Acquittal Did Not Automatically Discredit Approver's Testimony Against Appellant.

The appeal arose from a parcel bomb explosion at Phagwara, Punjab, on October 4, 1966, during a hunger strike by a labor union organizer, Ram Sahai. A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Insanity Defence Under Section 84 IPC and Burden of Proof Under Section 105 Evidence Act. The court held that insanity must be legal, not medical, to exempt from criminal liability, with the accused bearing the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities standard.

The judgment involved an appeal where the appellant raised the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, seeking reversal of a...