Search Results for "supply agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "supply agreement"

2154 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2154 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Essential Commodities Act Case — Collector Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 6A After Goods Released. Show cause notice for confiscation set aside as Collector had no authority to initiate proceedings under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 after essential commodities were already released.

12 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Shalimar Transport and Carting Contractor, through its proprietor Shaikh Hameed, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.

12 Jul 2011

The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act to Order Upholding Majority Arbitral Award. Arbitral Tribunal Had Set Aside Termination of CISP Agreement Due to Insufficient Proof of Corruption and Awarded Compensation.

22 Dec 2021

The appellant, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Limited (formerly SABMiller India Limited), a beer manufacturing and brewing company, appealed under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator. The Court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional fact and once prima facie satisfied, the court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Sep 2025

The appellant, Mahindra Defence Systems Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Water Supply Scheme. Court sets aside award to Respondent No.5 and directs fresh evaluation of petitioner's bid as per tender conditions.

6 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing plastic pipes and executi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

14 Aug 2014

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

14 Aug 2014

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

14 Aug 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)