Search Results for "substantive offence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "substantive offence"

2143 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2143 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents

2 May 2012

The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.

18 Jul 2022

The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witness. Conviction Under Sections 365, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

19 Mar 2014

The appellant, Shaikh Mahemood Sk. Osman, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.35 of 1997 for offences ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

16 Feb 2019

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.

24 Mar 2023

This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory and Discovery Evidence Found Insufficient. Court Holds That Gaps in Chain of Circumstances and Lack of Corroboration Render Conviction Unsafe Under Sections 302, 364, 404, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

27 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Witness Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4, 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

29 Aug 2017

The appellant, Balaji Sarjerao Kamble, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for the rape of a 7-year-old girl under Section 376 of the Indian Pen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

16 Sep 2015

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eye Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through consistent testimony of father and brother of deceased.

3 Nov 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rajesh alias Sarkari and Ajay Hooda against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IP...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)