Search Results for "section 417"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 417"

561 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 561 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Insurance Claim Rejection on Ground of Limitation — Time Bar Clause in Group Health Policy Not Applicable When Claim Submitted Within Policy Period. Clause 7.2 of Group Health Insurance Policy Requiring Claim Submission Within 30 Days of Discharge Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Cannot Defeat Substantive Right to Claim.

20 Apr 2026

The petitioner, an employee of Export Import Bank of India, held a Group Health Insurance policy from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. for the period 0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Receiver in Share Dispute Due to Lack of Urgency and Alternative Remedy. Court holds that civil suit for specific performance and injunction is maintainable and no case for appointment of receiver under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC is made out when possession is not threatened and legal remedy is available.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Aakash Educational Services Limited, filed two writ petitions (WP-11425-2024 and WP-11426-2024) seeking appointment of a receiver unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

5 Aug 2020

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Father in Property Dispute with Daughters — Criminal Proceedings Initiated After Civil Suit Dismissed Amount to Abuse of Process. FIR under Sections 406, 420, 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Quashed as Complainant Failed to Disclose Cognizable Offence and Proceedings Were Malicious.

3 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Vaman Narayan Ghode, an elderly widower, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Dispute — Compensation Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Court holds that the Arbitral Tribunal cannot award compensation beyond the Reference Court's award without proper evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two cross-petitions arising out of an arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, concerning compensation for l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Share Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court appoints sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)