Search Results for "section 326 IPC"

561 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 561 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeal Against Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Light of Procedural Lapses and Contradictory Eyewitness Accounts

The appeals arose from Sessions Case No. 63/2000 where accused nos.1 to 3 were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom Under Section 364A, 34 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused Based on Test Identification, Handwriting, and Call Records, Sentencing Them to Life Imprisonment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard Criminal Appeal Nos. 147 of 2006 and 134 of 2006, along with Criminal Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves three appeals against conviction under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that on 21.04.2013, th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Allegation of Throwing Burning Kerosene Lamp Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Case Under Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The case arises from an incident on 18.3.2008 (Holi day) where the victim Rakesh Mankar, an 18-year-old student, sustained burn injuries. The prosecut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt and Limitation Bar. Complaint Filed Beyond One Month and Without Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0033 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of valid demand notice is a prerequisite for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves two criminal applications filed by the applicants (original accused) seeking quashing of FIR No. 0033 of 2018 and connected proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Murder by Burning Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Mental Instability and Provocation.

The case arises from an incident on 14th April 2017, when the accused, Deepak Birbahadur Jath, poured petrol on Amravati (deceased) and set her on fir...