Search Results for "scrutiny date"

5136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Halbi Tribe Claim Due to Non-Consideration of Relevant Documents. Petitioner's Caste Validity Certificate Directed to be Issued as Committee Failed to Apply Correct Legal Principles Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Shubham Sanjay Nandanwar, a student, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Caste Certificate. Conversion to Christianity Does Not Automatically Result in Loss of Scheduled Caste Status; Scrutiny Committee Must Consider Community Acceptance.

The petitioner, Kiranlata Sontakke, claimed to belong to the Mahar caste, a Scheduled Caste. She was appointed as a Staff Nurse in 1995. Her caste cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside Office, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicant, Sharad Shankarrao Chavan, was working as Deputy Director (Research) in the Scheduled Tribe Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification in Lalbagh Entry Fee Collection Case — Violation of Transparency and Level Playing Field. Fresh Tender Directed with Revised Conditions to Ensure Fair Competition Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in manpower services and collection of en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...