APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "quality evidence"
2213 result(s) found
Found 2213 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by University and Colleges in Assistant Professor Recruitment Dispute — UGC Regulation 10 Applicable for Awarding Marks for Teaching Experience Under Table 3A.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by Allahabad University and its affiliated colleges against the judgment of the Allahabad High Co...
- 2011
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.
14 Sep 2016The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
20 Apr 2016The appellant, Dadaji Fakroji Kharkar, was an Assistant Grader at a Cotton Federation Centre. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Biloli, under Sec...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Murder Case on Grounds of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellants Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Offences Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Granted Bail as Co-Accused Already Released.
1 Jul 2022The appellants, accused Nos. 1 and 4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by the ...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows MIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimant failed to lead any evidence to justify higher compensation; Reference Court's enhancement from Rs.80,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per hectare held unjustified under Section 32(2) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961.
8 Jun 2017The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court at Akola which enhanced the compensatio...
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Landlords' Writ Petition Under Article 227, Restoring Eviction Decree on Bonafide Need Under Bombay Rent Act; Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside as It Erroneously Required All Co-Landlords to Testify to Prove Bonafide Need.
18 Jul 2005The dispute pertained to a tenancy of a room on the ground floor of house No.105, Wanawadi Bazar, Pune, under a monthly rent of Rs.5. The landlords we...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MP Power Management Company, Upholds Termination of Power Purchase Agreement for Non-Compliance of Conditions Subsequent. The Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with a non-statutory contract and that the termination was justified as the seller failed to fulfill conditions within the extended period.
1 Jan 2022The appellant, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, a wholly owned government company responsible for bulk purchase of electricity in Madhya Pradesh...
- 182
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Issues Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court exercised Article 142 powers to ensure continued access to justice while maintaining social distancing.
6 Apr 2020The Supreme Court of India, acting suo motu, issued guidelines for court functioning through video conferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The outb...
- 352
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Sep 2015The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...
- 121
