Search Results for "pancha witness"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction of Accused No.1 under Section 304-II IPC for Causing Death by Negligent Act Sustained.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment and order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Court, Bangalore Rural, Bangalore, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Child Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetration Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Vishwanath Sable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 25.10.2018 in Special Case (POCSO) No. 46 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was related to deceased and her testimony was not corroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Chandu. The prosecution case was that on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three accused persons under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Kausalyabai. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Ownership in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Successor Corporation Cannot Reopen Final Orders Under ULC Act After Vesting of Land in State.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition and a second appeal filed by the Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation (successor of Miraj ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence of Counsel. Court Relies on Bani Singh Precedent to Dismiss Appeal on Merits After Counsel Fails to Appear Despite Multiple Opportunities.

The appellant, Ramkrishna Ganesh Wagh, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Court, Akola, in Sessions Trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Brother of Deceased Failed to Show Perversity in Trial Court's Finding that Prosecution Did Not Complete Chain of Circumstances Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Rambhau Tatya Tambe, the brother of the deceased Ashabai, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Parricide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Shankara Zagade, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara on 30th September 2000 for the murder of his father...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Atrocities Act Offences. Conviction upheld based on complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, recovery of weapons, and FSL reports under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST POA Act, 1989.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gadag, in Special SC/ST Case No.9/2021. The appellant was convicted ...