Search Results for "ownership transfer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "ownership transfer"

2088 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2088 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction in Retail Outlet Dealership Selection Case Due to Applicant's Error and Land Possession. The Court Found BPCL Obligated to Guide Applicants and Consider Reclassification Under Group 1 as the Respondent Had Suitable Land on the Relevant Date, Despite Mistakenly Indicating Group 2 in the Online Application.

2 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute over the grant of a retail outlet dealership by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) to the respondent, who bel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

5 Aug 2020

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Municipal Notice for Building Repairs Under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Court Holds That Notice Must Be Issued to the Owner of the Property and Not to a Person in Occupation Without Ownership Rights.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Niraj Krishnakumar Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging a notice dated 16.11.2022 issued b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Invalid Land Documents. Petitioner's land documents executed after application date were not valid, and her candidature could be considered under Group 3.

23 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Meenakshi Rajkumar Sonawane, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 29.06.2019 by which her candidature for allotme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Injunction and Declaration of Ownership — Dispute Over Agricultural Land and Well. Court Holds That an Order Refusing Temporary Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Is Appealable Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC and That the Trial Court Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land and a well. Th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(b) of EPF Act — Hospital Established After Closure of Previous Unit Held Entitled to Infancy Exemption. The court held that the closure of the old hospital in 1989 and the subsequent establishment of a new hospital under a different trust with a new management structure constituted a new establishment under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

27 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Manipal Goa Cancer & General Hospital, challenged two orders: (a) an order dated 18/06/2007 by the Assistant Provident Fund Commission...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Decreeing Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

29 Aug 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Doddaballapur, in OS No.275/2002 (old No.76/2001), d...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)