Search Results for "last payment"

5258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Bona Fides of Insolvency Proceedings by Telecom Service Providers to Avoid AGR Dues. The Court held that no fresh dispute on AGR dues can be raised after final judgment and that spectrum cannot be subject of IBC proceedings.

The Supreme Court was hearing miscellaneous applications in the ongoing litigation concerning the definition of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) and the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Confiscation After Detention Under CGST Act. Goods Transported Without E-Way Bill and Alleged Undervaluation Leads to Dispute Over Proper Officer's Jurisdiction Under Sections 129 and 130 of CGST Act.

This writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench concerned a challenge to an appellate order confirming the confiscation of goods a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 17-B Application for Six Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer Must Pay Full Wages Pending Writ. Workmen's Affidavits of Unemployment Sufficient; No Need to Plead Not Gainfully Employed in Original Affidavit.

The case involves a Civil Application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, filed by Kirloskar Pneumatic Kamgar Sangh (the Union) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Sharebroker in Time-Barred Claim Dispute. Limitation Period for Quarterly Settlement Runs from End of Quarter Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mukesh Mansukhbhai Kanani, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal of the National Stock Exchange, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Possession Recovery in Trespass Suit Against Unauthorized Occupant of Tenanted Premises. Statutory Tenancy Cannot Be Bequeathed by Will; Only Heirs Entitled Under Section 5(11)(c) of Bombay Rent Act.

The plaintiff, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah, owner of the suit building AlJabriya Court at Marine Drive, Mumbai, filed a suit for recovery of posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal by Truck Owner Against MACT Award Discharging Insurer in Motor Accident Claims. Main issue is whether insurance company is liable for compensation despite breach of policy condition regarding carriage of passengers in a goods vehicle under Motor Vehicles Act.

The appeal arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27 April 1985 near village Apegaon. Truck No. MWN 581, driven by Rajendra Deshmukh, was carry...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...