Search Results for "jurisdictional conflict"

487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Application in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Possession and Prima Facie Case. Balance of convenience favors defendant as property stands in defendant's name and no irreparable loss shown.

The present matter is an interim application in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell and for permanent injunction. The plaintiff, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Retrenched Workmen. Retrenchment Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Management of Bosch Ltd., challenged the award of the Labour Court dated 30.11.2018 in AID No. 1/2014, which directed reinstatement of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Look Out Circulars Issued by Banks for Loan Recovery — Right to Travel Upheld. Banks Directed to Recall LoCs as Issuance Solely for Civil Debt Recovery Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty, an Indian citizen aged 78 years, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of Cooperative Society Director for Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Registrar's Order under Section 29A of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 set aside as no show-cause notice or hearing was given before suspension.

The petitioner, Prakash Ramachandra Hegde, was a director of Dodmane Group Village Seva Cooperative Society. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Socie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute. Court holds that an arbitral award granting refund of mobilization advance and damages for breach of contract does not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hind Offshore Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case — Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions. Court Held That Petitioner Is Entitled to Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 448, 504, 305 IPC, Section 12 POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act.

The petitioner, Somashekar, was the accused in Spl.C.No.279/2023 pending before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Hassan, for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Entries Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Rights Restored as Ex-Parte Cancellation Without Notice Held Illegal Under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, 227 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Thakkar Yogeshbhai Amritlal, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging multi...