Search Results for "employee grievances"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Writ Petition Challenging Excise Minister's Order in Country Liquor License Transfer Dispute. Petition Alleges Violation of Natural Justice and Erroneous Exercise of Review Power by Collector Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949.

The writ petition was filed by Bhartidevi Wd/o Motiram Moryani before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 90% Salary Grant Clause in Government Resolution for Aided Technical Institutions. Clause No.10 of GR dated 21.08.2015 does not curtail right to 100% salary as grant-in-aid is limited to 90% under Rule 9 of GR dated 18.05.1978.

The petitioner, Government Aided Technical Institutes Employees Welfare Board (GATIWEB), a registered society representing employees of aided technica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications as Belated and Misconceived. Refund Claim for Rs. 9.24 Crore Rejected Due to Delay and Laches, as Petition Filed After Six Years from Imposition of Duty.

The petitioner, Sansar Texturisers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two notifications dated...