Search Results for "demand and acceptance"

1918 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1918 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. High Court's reversal of conviction for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the acquittal of the respondent, Chandrasha, by the High Court of Karnataka. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...