Search Results for "composite Bombay State"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets

The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging AGRC Order Upholding Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Dispute between two groups of slum dwellers over choice of developer; court upholds AGRC's decision based on consent and merits.

The petitioners, New Jagruti Co-operative Housing Society Limited (Proposed) and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Apex Griev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Deletion of Leave Requirement Under Section 378 CrPC Does Not Automatically Entitle Complainant to Admission of Appeal for Final Hearing. The Court Must Still Apply Its Mind to Merits Before Admitting Appeal.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by complainants against acquittal. The core legal issue was whether, after the amendment to Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...