Search Results for "chief minister interference"

648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Maharashtra's Loan Waiver Scheme for Farmers — Scheme Held Not Arbitrary or Unconstitutional. Court finds that the classification based on loan amount is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sanjaykumar Bhalchandra Patil, a farmer from Jalgaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Scientific Officer for Unauthorised Absence and Misconduct — Petitioner Failed to Justify Absence Despite Repeated Opportunities. The court held that the termination was proportionate and that the principles of natural justice were complied with.

The petitioner, Mr. Sahivanagouda H. Patil, was a Scientific Officer at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) who had developed high-yielding groundnut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition Against ONGC's Banning Order. Petitioner Challenges Three-Year Blacklisting on Grounds of Natural Justice Violation.

The petitioner, M/s J.K. Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in corrosion resistant coating application, challenged a banning order dated 25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Government's Power to Constitute Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells Without Specific Legislation. High Court's Quashing of Government Orders Set Aside on Ground That Executive Orders for Investigation Do Not Require Statutory Definition of 'Land Grabbing'.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Government of Tamil Nadu against the common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 10.02.2015, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition by Investigative Journalist Seeking Transfer of Criminal Cases from Uttarakhand Courts. Apprehension of Malicious Prosecution Unsubstantiated as Charge Sheets Filed and Trial Courts Capable of Fair Adjudication.

The petitioner, Umesh Kumar Sharma, an investigative journalist, filed transfer petitions under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s...