Search Results for "attachment orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "attachment orders"

757 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 757 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Execution Decree Holder to Seek Possession Against Third Party Resisters Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that executing court can decide objections of third parties claiming independent title without requiring a separate suit, and amendment of execution petition is permissible to avoid multiplicity.

18 Dec 2020

The case arises from a specific performance decree obtained by Ayyavoo Udayar (predecessor of appellants) against vendors (respondent nos. 3 and 4) fo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty on Arbitrator's Interim Order. The court held that an order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not an 'award' under Article 11 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and thus no stamp duty is payable.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award and Recovery Order Under Article 227 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Not Availed. The court held that a writ petition under Article 227 is not maintainable when the petitioner has not availed the statutory remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge an arbitral award under the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.

7 Jun 2018

The petitioners, Rajendra Baban Deshmukh and Sangita Rajendra Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)