Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Compulsory Service Bonds of ESIC Medical Students; Questions Validity Under ESI Act and Constitution
6 Apr 2026...
Search Results for "Unreasonable Delay"
1694 result(s) found
Found 1694 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements.
23 Dec 2025The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, see...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Educational Trust Due to Delay and Laches. Allotment of 1999 and 2008 not challenged until 2013, petition held not maintainable.
7 Aug 2024The petitioners, residents of village Dhangawadi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the al...
- 404
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.
25 Oct 2024The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...
- 401
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Matter to Larger Bench on Automatic Vacation of Stay Orders Under Article 142 of the Constitution. The Court expressed reservations about directions in Asian Resurfacing that interim stay orders automatically lapse after six months, holding that such automatic vacation without judicial application of mind could cause miscarriage of justice.
29 Feb 2024The Supreme Court, in a judgment authored by Justice Abhay S. Oka, addressed the correctness of directions issued in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency ...
- 568
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to 30-Year Delay in Execution — Inordinate Delay Snaps Live Link Between Grounds and Detention Purpose. Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act Set Aside as Stale Grounds Violate Right to Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.
27 Sep 2023The petitioner, Abdul Rasheed alias Basheer, challenged a detention order dated 17th May 1993 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.'s Writ Petitions Against Property Tax Demands by NMMC. Court holds that property tax demands for petroleum storage tanks and pipelines are illegal and without authority of law under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
22 Apr 2026The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed three writ petitions challenging property tax demands raised by the Navi Mumbai Municipal ...
- 145
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.
23 Apr 2021The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...
- 70
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance — Trial Court Decree Granting Specific Performance and Cancellation of Sale Deed Under Challenge. The Court Reserved Judgment; Outcome Not Stated in This Excerpt.
22 Jan 2024These two regular first appeals arose from the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015 in O.S.No.594/2005 passed by the XI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengal...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Agreement to Purchase is Cancelled Due to Developer's Default. The court held that since no conveyance deed was executed and the agreement was cancelled due to developer's default, the petitioner is entitled to refund of stamp duty under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.
11 Jan 2024The petitioner, Satish Buba Shetty, a retired bank official, entered into an Agreement to Purchase a flat with M/s. Vijaykamal Properties Private Limi...
- 58
