Search Results for "SAT"

1138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rukmuddin Kudminchi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.52/2011 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Tractor Accident Victim, Holds Insurance Company Liable Despite Tractor Being Used for Agricultural Purpose. Claimant sustained fracture of left femur; compensation enhanced from Rs.9,15,840 to Rs.14,15,840 with 6% interest.

The appellant, a claimant in a motor accident case, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Girl in Neighbor's House — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence Under Sections 376, 342, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vishnudas s/o Uddhao Bhagade, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 342 (wrongful co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Parricide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the fatal blow was struck during a sudden altercation without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Hasan Geblya Padvi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, for the murder of his father, Geblya Rava Padvi, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...