Search Results for "Revised Plan Application"

447 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 447 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quo Warranto Petition Against Panchayat Member for Holding Office of Profit. Respondent No. 3 Disqualified Under Section 12(1)(d) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Being a Government Contractor.

The petitioner, Mrs. Zarina Blanca Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of quo warranto agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Vacancy of Panchayat Seat and Quo Warranto Against Panch. Petitioner Failed to Establish That Respondent No. 2 Was Disqualified Under Section 10(1)(c) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Having More Than Two Children.

The petitioner, Mr. Mansoor Mulla, a citizen and voter from Ward No. 9 of Curti, Ponda, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...