Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bride Burning Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Gorakh Ramkrushna Mourya (accused no. 1) and Ramkrushna Mourya (accused no. 2), were convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellant, Shivaji Vithal Godse, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Kalyan Dagadu Mavalkar and sentenced t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for smashing head with stone set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kurashid Mohd. Umar Ghori, was convicted by the 8th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai on 21st June 2008 in Sessions Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vinod Shashikant Ingle and Pooja Vinod Ingle, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of Arun Ingle under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Baburao Marathe, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2005. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals, Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case. Evidence of Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence Proves Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34, IPC.

The appeals challenged the conviction of two accused by the Sessions Court for murder and causing disappearance of evidence. The prosecution's case wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Snatching Case Due to Lack of Identification Parade and Recovery. Conviction Under Section 379 IPC Set Aside as Identification in Police Station Without Test Identification Parade is Unreliable and No Recovery from Appellant.

The appellant, Alam Adam Mansuri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Special MCOCA Case No.4 of 2013 for the offence p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 489B r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or use of counterfeit currency notes.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Prabhakar Patlola and Venkatesh Chanda under Section 489B read with Section 34 of the Indian Pen...