Search Results for "Political Interference"

787 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 787 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Petition by Employer in Departmental Inquiry Case Due to Procedural Flaws. Tribunal's Order Quashing Dismissal Upheld as Inquiry Failed to Lead Oral Evidence, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Gujarat Civil Services Tribunal Rules.

The dispute involved a petition filed by the District Development Officer and another petitioner challenging the judgment of the Gujarat Civil Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Contesting Election Without Permission. Regulation 48B of Bombay State Transport Employees Services Regulations Requires Prior Permission; Dismissal Upheld for Wilful Disobedience.

The appellant, Umesh Kalyanrao Galande, was a helper employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. He applied for permission to contes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer Order of Chief Engineer in MSETCL for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy. Transfer of Employee Mid-Academic Year Without Considering Family Circumstances Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Departmental Transfer Guidelines.

The petitioner, Sanjay Tulshiram Shinde, a Chief Engineer with Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL), challenged an office orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Frivolous Writ Petitions Seeking Inclusion in Voters List as Abuse of Process. Petitioners Found to Have Filed Multiple Baseless Petitions with Suppression of Facts, Leading to Dismissal with Costs of Rs. 25,000.

The petitioners, Pushpa B.R., Sanjeevmurthy, Karthik S Murthy, and Annapoorna B.S., filed four writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification for President Posts in District Consumer Forums Due to Lack of Consultation with High Court. Appointment Process Under Section 10 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Requires Prior Consultation with High Court Chief Justice.

The petitioners, three advocates, challenged a notification dated 23.04.2012 issued by the Under Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supplies and Co...