Search Results for "Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation"

2114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Lease of Manjeetnagar Garden Space to Private Sports Club. Petition Alleges Illegal Diversion of Recreational Open Space Under Development Control Rules and Building Bye-Laws

The writ petition challenged an agreement dated 30.3.1998 between the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation and the Icon National Sports Club, leasing a 26...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.256 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Pune Ring Road Project — Public Purpose and Compliance with Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shankar Dabhade and others, and Raghunath Sudam Dabhade and others, challenging a notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.259 OF 2009

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bhimshakti Vichar Manch, a registered trust, and another petitioner, challenging the Foodgrain Based Disti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...