Search Results for "Continuous Occupation"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3388 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Child Abuse Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 324, 201 IPC and Goa Children's Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dr. Vasudev Deshprabhu, was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of DV Act Proceedings Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Acts of Domestic Violence Allegedly Occurred in Germany, Not Within India, Hence Magistrate at Nagpur Had No Jurisdiction Under Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The applicant, Sumeet Ninave, challenged an order dated 21.10.2022 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, rejecting his applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Exemption from Personal Appearance for Accused Director in CBI Case Due to Business Hardship. Section 205 CrPC Discretion Exercised to Balance Trial Progress and Accused's Convenience.

The appellant, Puneet Dalmia, was accused No. 3 in a CBI case (C.C. No. 12 of 2013) pending before the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...