Search Results for "Andheri East"

703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral property dismissed as barred by limitation and adverse possession established by defendants.

The appellant, Rajkumar Chaganlal Shah, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Trial Court's Finding of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court holds that valuation for jurisdiction is determined by the relief claimed in the plaint, not by the defendant's objections.

The appellant, Nehalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that certain agreements were void and for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow and Son's Admiralty Suit for Compensation for Death of Chief Engineer on Duty — Claim Arising from Contract of Employment Not Within Admiralty Jurisdiction. No Maritime Lien Exists for Compensation for Death on Duty, and Suit Barred by Limitation.

The plaintiffs, Alice Elizabeth D'Souza (widow) and Alwin Mathew D'Souza (minor son), filed an admiralty suit against Motor Vessel Magalam (defendant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...