Search Results for "1982"

3213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants, who were the original plaintiffs, against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MSEDCL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Binding. Allegations of Mala Fides Not Entertained Without Impleading the Officer.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged their transfer orders issued by the company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Excise Licence Case — Policy Restriction on Multiple FLII Licences Upheld. Refusal to Renew Second Foreign Liquor Licence Under Section 137(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, Upheld as Consistent with Government Policy and Not Discriminatory.

The appellant, Nandkishor Shivprasad Jaiswal, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge dismissing his Writ Petition No. 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...