Search Results for "1955"

2636 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2636 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Levy Sugar Price Fixation Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Levy Sugar Price Determined by Central Government Is Not Arbitrary and Does Not Violate Article 14 or 19(1)(g) of Constitution.

The petitioners, two sugar cooperative factories, filed criminal writ petitions challenging the fixation of levy sugar price by the Central Government...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Will Deed Cannot Override Statutory Tenancy Rights as Tenant's Status on Tillers' Day is Determinative Under Section 32G.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands in Village Talabid, taluka Karad, district Satara. The original owner, Shamu Vithu Chavan, was a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Anticipatory Bail in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Ganja. Custodial Interrogation Necessary When Recovery Exceeds Commercial Quantity and Accused Is Named in Statements of Co-Accused.

The petitioner, Haridas Shankar Gaikwad, aged 52 years, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by RTO Agents' Association Challenging Eviction Order Under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. Eviction and Arrears of Rent Upheld as Competent Authority's Orders Were Not Successfully Challenged.

The petitioner, The Association of Recognized Agents, is a registered association of RTO agents who were allotted a room in the RTO Compound at Tulsiw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...