Search Results for "residential order"

3475 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3475 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. AGRC's Reversal of Developer Termination Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Hanuman Nagar (Jogeshwari) SRA CHS (Proposed), is a society of slum dwellers residing on a plot in Jogeshwari, Mumbai. In 2006, the ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals for Proper Market Value Determination. Reference Court's award based on averages set aside; matter remanded for fresh consideration of comparable sale instances and prior awards.

The judgment pertains to two First Appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings. The appellants, Dattatraya Ramchandra Chinchalikar through his l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Challenge to SRA Order Approving Termination of Development Agreement and Appointment of New Developer. The Court examined the legality of the order under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and the requirement of fair hearing.

The petitioner, Shivkupa Builders & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 14 October 2009 passed by the Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals, Enhances Compensation for Dharuhera Village Acquisition. Land Losers Entitled to Rs. 1,49,14,975/- per Acre Based on Exemplary Sale Deeds Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of twenty-seven appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings in Haryana. Sixteen appeals pertained to acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Frivolous Writ Petitions Seeking Inclusion in Voters List as Abuse of Process. Petitioners Found to Have Filed Multiple Baseless Petitions with Suppression of Facts, Leading to Dismissal with Costs of Rs. 25,000.

The petitioners, Pushpa B.R., Sanjeevmurthy, Karthik S Murthy, and Annapoorna B.S., filed four writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...