Search Results for "prior High Court permission"

5104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 After Reconstruction. Court Holds Grievance Rendered Academic by Interim Reconstruction and Directs Consideration of Regularization Under the Act.

The petitioner, a lessee of a structure in Dharavi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a show-ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.

The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Arrears of Rent, Damage, and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Doctrine of Relation Back Not Applicable as Amendment Was Not Allowed to Relate Back to Original Filing Date.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by tenants (Anil Joginder Sachdev and Rajeev Joginder Sachdev) against a decree of eviction passe...