Search Results for "power exchange"

1906 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1906 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Acquisition Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Land Acquired Under 1894 Act but Not Compensated Due to Unfulfilled Alternate Land Offer Entitles Petitioners to Compensation Under 2013 Act.

The petitioners, Shital Anna Walawade, Neminath Anna Walawade, and Suman Anna Walawade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Shikshan Sevak Appointment Approval Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's appointment as Shikshan Sevak was approved by Education Officer but later cancelled by Deputy Director without hearing the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Pandurang Narayan Kanekar, was appointed as a 'Shikshan Sevak' on 21st August 2012 by respondent No.6 (Talere Panchkroshi Shikshan Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon UAPA Case on Medical Grounds — Age and Health Conditions of 83-Year-Old Petitioner Considered. Court held that prolonged incarceration violates Article 21 right to life and health, granting bail under Section 439 CrPC and Section 43D(5) UAPA.

The petitioner, Dr. P. Varavara Rao, an 83-year-old poet and activist, was arrested in connection with the Bhima Koregaon case and charged under the U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Oral Appointee Sweeper Challenging Termination Without Regularisation. Petitioner failed to establish continuous service of 240 days under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and was not a workman under Section 2(s) of the Act.

The petitioner, Ashok Namdeo Sangale, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 02/11/2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...